Who Are These Israelites Anyway?

Dr. Cerdas busied himself on July 26, 2011 when he told our neighbor that he and his cohorts were going to return, break in the gate, take our children, register them, vaccinate them and place them in public school. That is a serious threat coming from a religious ministerial sect working in coordination with another religious order, the United Nations. The United Nations is a body that countries contract with and they have some extreme anti Semitic values. Let's have a look at some of the ideals promoted by the United Nations and their various appendages. The actions of the public officials run contrary with the standards listed in the United Nations Prevention of Genocide of 1948 and Codigo Penal of Costa Rica, 127.

Dr. Cerdas' threats reinforce the fact that Dr. Cerdas intends to carry out his threats WITHOUT establishing jurisdiction over my children. This jurisdiction is established through contract which is identified by public registry.

Few people understand that when government appears to have smashed their constitutional rights, that in reality, they voluntarily entered a system whereby they waived their rights. Many wish to receive benefits from the state's varied social schemes, and for such, they must waive their constitutional rights.

Of course, my family would never interfere with other families' decisions on what they think, what they worship, what social policies they adopt, how they discipline their children, what car they drive or how they do their hair. It simply is not our business.

It does seem the business, however, of faceless bureaucrats to involve themselves lawlessly in my family's life in order to impress upon us their religious dogma called 'Humanism.' As Israelites, it is not our desire to be missionaries. Our beliefs do not require recruitment of others. The nation of Israel is a nation of people and IS NOT to be construed as the state of the star on the East coast of the Mediterranian Sea. That is a geopolitical zone established by contract under a ruse called the Balfour Declaration and has little to do with the Nation of Israel and has more to do with Zionist bankers.

Israelites are a nation of Law, not religious dogma. Religions typically require recruitment and involve commercial contracts and registration. In their inception, religions tend to be innocuous and give ephemeral releases for populations in their stressful existence in a complex world. When these programming agencies, arranged by a few elite men who suffer the same greed, fear, lust, vanity and jealousy of all men in the flesh become megalomaniac in their utopian dogmas, Law is the only recourse for Israelites to find shelter. Israelites sojourn throughout the world existing in lands of others who have also adopted the God of Israel as their foundation of Law. Costa Rica is one such nation as the constitution prescribes.

The concept of the nation of Israel is a critical understanding in the coming posts, because we must be able to discern the difference between Law and religion, morals and dogmas.

We will return to the concept of jurisdiction, artificial personas and how that affects our relationship with governing bodies under Romans 13, but for now I suggest the readers of this blog and the enemies of my nation begin by defining the following terms:

Israelite, Jew, Zionist, proselyte, semite, liege and regis. We must understand that deception is in the words and our enslavement is cast by our own hand or mouth. You may be surprised what you find in Oz. With no understanding of history, you will never know who you are. If you do not know who you are, you will never know where you are headed. It will all tie in soon.

For those who have so vengefully desecrated theLaw and, with full intent, damaged my harmless family in return for shallow gains in your ephemeral world, you will reap what you sow. Brick by brick, my friends.

Is It Mandatory to Have State ID?

After the interview with Dr. Cerdas on You Tube, we followed up with an Affidavit and request for information. This is where things get REALLY interesting, because these public servants begin telling us something quite astonishing. 'We do not have to answer any questions unless you provide identification amongst other information.' However, they did not require this ID (identification of a contract or registry) in order to threaten us in the flesh. So that is how we answer, in the flesh. Obviously they had no trouble identifying us in order to make their threats, so why do we need state issued ID to defend ourselves?

It is the catch 22 of every government that practices civil or common law. No number, no joinder. No joinder, no contract. No contract, no action. Since there is no body of crime (habeas corpus) criminal proceedings are also impossible.

Never the less, we do want to help these misguided bureaurcrats find the proper process for a remedy. As such, we offered the following notice:

Answer to Petition

Patricia Mesen Arroyo's response was, 'We do not have to answer to you unless you have state ID, amongst other information.'

WHY is that so important? The public servants did not need our ID to threaten to take our children. This is an action in assumpsit. They are ASSUMING we are numbered subjects of the state, with their jurisdiction. However, we have told these people that we are not registered. The judge should instruct the plaintiff to establish jurisdiction by either:
a)Presenting our registration through public records. (of course they do not exist.) OR
b)Presenting a bonafide complaint such as that we have abducted someone's children.

The reason the judge does not do this is because he is heading an administrative tribunal under the treaty powers (article 7) of the state that allows Costa Rica to subcontract out certain administrative duties. As such, he is not a constitutionally recognized judge, but a tribunal arbitrator. In other words, what I arrived at on September 6, 2011 was not a court of record (constitutional court.) If it were a court of record, there would be charges to answer to. On September 2, 2011 PANI lawyer, Patricia Mesen Arroyo, told us (with great reluctance) that there were no charges. 'The citation is only to collect information about you.'

Now we see the clarity of why Dr. Cerdas needed our signature. You see, we neither have contracts with the state of Costa Rica, NOR do we have any contracts with the United Nations. A position VERY uncommon.

Some people may believe erroneously that jurisdiction is based solely upon geography, IE, 'anyone living in this country has to follow codes and statutes,' however, jurisdiction encompasses far more than that. The government does not own the land and neither do the people own any more than which they create. That includes idols and democracies. Those idols and democracies can own nothing more than that of the individuals who erected them.

Patricia Mesen Arroyo admits that amongst other identification components, state ID is necessary for her to engage in dialogue. She admits that she is unable to legally converse with the human identification by which we freely present ourselves. For the state to make an action, we must be identified as a person, under contract. The number is simply identifying not the human, but the personification of a legal fiction. It is a comprehensive insurance contract with the state. Without such, they cannot converse. Also failing that, since there is no body of crime, they cannot make charges or act. Without first identifying that the individual is under contract, these public officials are assuming that a contract exists. Using threats and coercion under assumption is purely criminal. The officials, to this date, assume that all children belong to them. This is a seriously misguided concept that has been repeated in history by those practicing idol worship. This is what my jurisdiction query is all about.

To force me to register my children with the state is a violation of article 13.3. To force anyone into an association with any entity, real or artificial, would fly in the face of article 25.

Patricia Mesen Arroyo and her accomplices fail to establish jurisdiction over my children. More on Patricia Mesen Arroyo later.

Slight of Hand

As we have seen on the You Tube videos, Dr. Cerdas insists that we sign both his order as well as the receipt of it. He insisted that before we examine the order, we first sign not only the receipt of the order, but the actual order he came to deliver. We were not able to first take the order to counsel. If we had signed the order, we would have accepted the order as it was written, thus agreeing to perform what the order stated. Conversely, if we did not sign the order, it would go to the administrative tribunal under the assumption that the ministry had jurisdiction. Dr. Cerdas would state that we refused to follow their order and the process would continue.

If a law had been broken, why did Dr. Cerdas require any signatures?

The reason is that he needed jurisdictional joinder in the form of a contract to proceed with an administrative tribunal. When a crime occurs, no signatures are necessary for the prosecution to initiate an action. Only the elements of habeas corpus and mens rea are necessary to establish an action. If the matter is civil, then agreements (contracts), or breeches of such, come into question and the Plaintiff would have to provide evidence of said contracts by the power of a writ of subpoena duces tecum to establish the veracity of the claim. In the order seen here, health office, Ebais #4, states we refused vaccines.

The claim of our refusal was based on the testimony of Dra. Ana Gabriela Mora Rojas, which can be seen here.

However, we never refused vaccines. We demurred the matter of vaccine entitlements, awaiting the ministry to rebut our scriptural position on the matter, as per article 75. A demurrer is not a refusal.

We are prohibited from accepting vaccines from a scriptural health perspective. We are also prohibited from receiving other free entitlements. We are also prohibited from worshiping man made gods and their extra-curricular social redistribution schemes. We are also prohibited from engaging in surety for the debts incurred from such redistribution schemes. Article 75 of the Constitution supports those scriptural perspectives.

My application of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.

Rather than proceed with reckless coercion and threats, the ministry of health parishioners could have refuted our lawful position. This respectful form of open dialogue would have supported jurisprudence and would have gone far in preserving family, health, life and liberty. Such an attempt for open dialogue would support the spirit of law. This clearly was not the purpose of these religious missionaries.

Dr. Cerdas' document orders that we present vaccination papers (that do not exist) or begin receiving mandatory entitlements (a legal oxymoron.) Dr. Cerdas insisted that we agree to the order before having counsel examine it. That is why we could only conditionally accept the order, as seen in the video. Dr. Cerdas accepted and signed our conditional acceptance as witnessed by his personal driver and police escort, as well as members of my family. However, Dr. Cerdas then refused to give us the order whereby we could take it to counsel.

Furthermore, Dr. Cerdas noted that we did not want to receive the document and, as seen in the video, counsels with his witnesses to conspire in stating that we refused the document when in fact it was Dr. Cerdas who said, "I cannot deliver this." Our wish to protect a signature by creating joinder with our conditional acceptance precludes the order from being accepted as written. Dr. Cerdas' job that day was to conscript us unconditionally, that jurisdiction may be established. This indeed was clever missionary work.

How can we produce documents that do not exist, particularly when we have explained in great detail WHY they do not exist and why we are prohibited from vaccinating our children. The ministry refuses to refute our affidavits and constructive notices with any proper modality proving errors in our lawful position.

Dr. Cerdas FAILS TO PROVE HIS JURISDICTION over my children, or refute my affidavits or constructive notices.

Would Anybody Be Opposed to This?

That no one can force anybody into any association whatsoever.

Freedom of religion or to practice no religion at all.

That sovereignty exists within the nation (the people), not elected groups which may be lobbied for special interests.

That public servants are public SERVANTS and as such are bound to preordained law via oaths that they may not exceed their mandates.

That public servants (officials) have a duty to answer to any request even if that answer is that they are unsure and offer their supervisors as a potential next step in order to clarify and answer the request.

That foreigners may exist under the same prime protections from government as nationals.

That no such group of public servants may alter the prime directive given them.

IF YOU BELIEVE IN THE ABOVE STATED PRINCIPLES, THEN YOU CAN FAVOR THE FOLLOWING: Constitution of Costa Rica

2012

With sips of introspection and bites of comfort, memories have been tucked away. A new year begins. I offer simple words for this next bit of the journey: fortitude, accountability, freedom, love, health, contentment. Happy New Year!

Anonymous Nonsense Vs. Cold Hard Facts

The purpose of publishing all of the affidavits, constructive notices and events involving the interaction between our friends and the Ministry of Health and PANI in Puriscal, Costa Rica is strictly for the transparent documentation of facts. However, there have been several anonymous comments left to one blog post in particular which dwell on opinions, fairies in the clouds and other off point topics. Curiously, the comments focus on my own editorials and are ripe with conviction; yet no one has uttered a peep regarding the work that James has submitted to the courts and ministries. Admittedly, my writing demands very little and is much easier to attack. I do hope that thoughtful readers as well as off point, anonymous individuals are taking the time to absorb James' research and presentation of law and facts.

My objective in writing today is not to partake in virtual opinion ping pong, but to hopefully establish more facts. An anonymous commenter has claimed to be living in Costa Rica with their family and publicly choosing not to vaccinate their children or send them to public school. Still another anonymous commenter has claimed to know hundreds of families in Costa Rica who are openly foregoing vaccinations for their children and choosing to home-school. I do not understand why anyone with such valuable information would choose to publish opinions and experiences anonymously. I urge the commenters to present the laws and facts that support the claims they have made. This information may not help our friends, but would undoubtedly aid other families living in Costa Rica who are struggling with these same issues.

The suggestion that the Ministry of Health and PANI are in accordance with hundreds of families living in Costa Rica without injecting their children with mandatory vaccines contradicts the testimony of Dr. Cerdas who, in the driveway of our friends on June 30, 2011, read from the General Law Health book the exact articles which require contracted residents under the age of 15 to vaccinate and re-vaccinate. It is difficult to believe that Costa Rica is in any way disregarding its own mandates. Inside Costa Rica published an article on January 26, 2010 regarding the mandatory H1N1 vaccine for selected high risk groups in Costa Rica. According to that article:

"The vice-ministra de Salud, Ana Morice, explained that the CCSS will be compiling a list from medical records of persons that are required to be vaccinated,...The vice-ministra said that those people on the list who do not want to receive the vaccine, will be obligated to do so. "The idea is not use force, even though we have the right to go with the police to pull people from their homes and take them to a medical centre to be vaccinated", explained Morice. The mandatory vaccination is based on government decree 35703-S of the Ley General de Salud published on January 21, 2010 in the official government publication, La Gaceta."

What an eerie contemplation that you too may be obligated to be injected with a substance that you may or may not philosophically agree with and that your eligibility to be on the list is based on your personal medical records. If we ask the government to protect us, we can't cry when we don't like their approach.

I suspect that the numerous anonymous comments which suggest that our friends are only having trouble because they have not contracted with the state of Costa Rica and that it is possible to refuse that which public ministries deem mandatory and necessary is only a repeated desperate attempt to divert the focus away from the fact that not only is it impossible to refuse the mandated gifts from the State, but should you ever have trouble in Costa Rica, don't count of due process of law either.

Perhaps these numerous anonymous comments are made by individuals who have financial interests which are dependent on a positive image of Costa Rica. My opinion, your opinion and other irrelevant references to mythical creatures do not dilute the fact that our friends have not committed a crime; there is no habeas corpus. If anyone believes that our friends did harm by not soliciting social contracts with the state of Costa RIca, just ask yourself why our friends have yet to be presented with any charges against them; why, if they were not contracted with the state, it was the ministry of health and not immigration to storm our friends' sanctuary; and why due process has been completely denied to our friends?

Our friends understand and follow the laws. Without lying or cheating or doing any harm to anyone, our friends live, committed to personal responsibility so as to never add to the great burden of so many needy people who choose to contract and benefit from the generous social entitlements of a struggling, developing nation. Our friends are not jealously demanding that anyone think or live as they do. It is shortsighted to protect fragile interests by trashing victims. Why not, instead, stand tall and demand due process to prove that the product you are selling lives up the glorious image you promote? Pura Vida.

Response to article published in A.M. Costa Rica

The Table of the Steadfast

On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 an article was published on the front page of A.M. Costa Rica about Nikoline’s death and the “long-running dispute on vaccinations” between her family and government officials in Puriscal. My hope, is that anyone aware of this tragic saga will take the time to read more than just that article published in the daily English publication, or the easy introductions on my blog. My hope is that everyone will take the time to read the work that James has tirelessly researched, drafted and submitted to the ministries and courts. It is all here on this blog.

I am disheartened to see that the focus of the article in A.M. Costa Rica is on the actions and ideals of our friends. I would wish that an educated journalist writing a story about the tragic passing of a young girl, would take the time to analyze the actions of the officials who issued and carried out the order to raid our friends’ home and forced them to seek refuge at a safe distance. I am perplexed by the choice of the word, “stubborn,” to describe parents who honorably answered to each and every offer, request and order submitted to them by the representatives of the ministries who brought claims against them.

The article in A.M. Costa Rica loosely ties facts, inaccuracies and opinions together to paint a picture void of opportunity for readers to question the actions of the public servants involved in this case. The article fails to question why the home of our friends was raided. The article fails to question the jurisdiction of local health ministries over undocumented foreigners. The article goes as far as suggesting that the determined spirit of the father to battle injustice played a part in the passing of his daughter. I beg of you, readers, to remember that the only reason Nikoline was navigating unfamiliar terrain was because her family had been driven out of their sanctuary by an order from a judge; the same judge who refused to present charges to or acknowledge our friend in the flesh who had been summonsed to his chamber.

With minimal effort of traveling to Puriscal and interviewing any one of the local people, the writer of the article published in A.M. Costa Rica could have learned and shared that this family was a loved and respected part of the community; a family who “properly schooled” their children to speak three languages, understand economics, production, science, history, law, appreciate literature by authors from across the globe and spans of time, and whose children have the manners and self discipline which allowed them to sing at the National Theatre with the highly acclaimed choir of Don Carlos Luis Fallas. With minimal effort the writer could have also shared that the oldest daughters traveled to nearby schools to aid local children with their English lessons.

That this family lacked modern transportation and relied on their own horses or hired taxis is a small testament to their unyielding dedication to abide by law. Included in the constructive notice submitted to EBAIS #4 in Puriscal, and published on this blog on July 2, 2011:

“I recognize the sovereignty of the state of CR as well as the sovereignty of the God of Israel. CR article 2.”

“I am attempting to conduct myself and arrange the conduct of my family in such a way as to follow the rules of both sovereigns for the purpose of being in accordance with rules of peaceful conduct and submission to well heeled government as well as faithful servants to the God of Israel. ‘Qui jure suo utitur, nemini facit injuriam.’ Acts 5:29”

The writer of the article in A.M. Costa Rica notes that our friends made repeated inquiry to the government officials to whether they are subservient to the God of Israel. That was just one of four questions that our friends repeatedly asked.

In the constructive notice, which was published on this blog on July 2, 2011, our friends also state:

“Be it known that we have acted in accordance with all laws and attended promptly to any charge, citation or summons presented to us. In any controversy, we present ourselves voluntarily and with out prejudice; that the matter may have a swift resolution. No undue force will be required in any dealing with us. Article 37”

I have just highlighted a few of the many pertinent points made in just one of the several documents that our friends have submitted to the ministries and courts. Our friends’ defense was replied to with coercion, threats, intimidation, denial of charges, and UNDUE FORCE.

Interestingly, an anonymous comment was posted to one of my blog entries by a member of a family living as residents in Costa Rica. Included in the lengthy comment left on November 24, 2011- “Our family lives in Costa Rica. We are residents, and we also homeschool and refuse vaccinations. Not only has this been 100% okay with the Costa Rican government they are fully aware of what we are doing and have no complaints.”

In which direction will the people point fingers of blame? At the family who is diligently asserting their right and duty to practice personal responsibility and follow God’s law, or to the moody tyrants who need to be reminded that they are in fact public servants under the scrutiny of the masses?

A Letter of Appreciation

I had not expected to return to Costa Rica so soon. I am grateful that for as impossible as it seemed to jump on a plane with my girls and be with our best friends, that we were able to. My only regret, one I share with my husband, is that it was, in fact, impossible for him to be with us. You see, our family has shared an incredible journey over the last seven years with James and Birgitte and their outstanding kids. Our friendship and experiences together are beyond words.

At the memorial service for Nikoline, we were overwhelmed by a sea of familiar, loving faces. The community came together to grieve, to heal, to support the family who needed it most. Unfortunately, Nikoline's mother, father, sisters and brothers were unable to shed their defenses and let their bodies drink love and healing from the friends and family who had gathered to hold them. Even in the most intimate of circumstances, the threat of continued harm was lurking in the shadows with the uninvited. The potential that the government officials could potentially issue another lawless order could not be ignored.

What I realize, from hundreds of miles away, is that the memorial is not over. The closure is not complete. I hope that everyone reading this will understand that our friends still need that strong, healing support. They still need all of us standing beside them, holding them up. This is no time for should or ought to. This is only the time for love and solidarity. If we all stay strong and recognize that law trumps opinion then our friends, the victims of this injustice, will have a more solid bridge to cross.

Here is a letter of appreciation from Nikoline's father, first in English and then in Spanish:

To the readers of this blog, I would like at this time to offer a word of appreciation to our friends and supporters during our most difficult times. We would like to thank the following people:

Connie and Dick for courageously witnessing, providing shelter and delivering documents in the times we needed those things most, as well as taking the great care to keep Nikoline's pictures fresh in everyone's minds.

Fred and Mary for witnessing and dealing with confrontations with government and PANI officials, as well as keeping our cats and dogs fed and an eye on our house.

Sorayda, Luis Diego and their family, Lise Schafer, Gloriela and Daniel for looking after our dogs, cats and house in our hastened absence.

Gustavo Rojas for his nexus with the courts.

Rick for his information connections and bridging of financial issues.

Witnesses and supporters; Tu Anh , Athena and Eduardo for their delivering of documents and witnessing.

Lise and Asger for their continuous offer of safe housing and Lise's special trip to CR to assist where she could.

Don Carlos for his discipline and care in music classes and choir. Our family loved the presentations and practice. I considered these music classes and Don Carlos' ideals as an intergal part of our home schooling. My girls adored Don Carlos and he encouraged my girls to prepare and be at their best.

Patricia and Roberto for opening their house for us during our worst time after Nikoline's death, that the family may congregate and grieve in security and privacy. I wish to offer Pat and Bob further thanks for establishing a safe house to make plans, preparations and not be worried about lesser matters as they provided food, shelter and unlimited transportation and support.

Uncle John for watching over the children and financial support. Next time we stay up till 5:00 am John, I do hope it is under better occasion. You will always be a hero to me and my family.

Auntie Laurie, for her no nonsense approach to getting things done at any cost. Laurie is one of the few people I know of in life who has seen it all and from her experiences is the least judgmental and most pragmatic individual in my camp. That clarity and unbiased nature is refreshing and productive and kept us rolling.

Lisbeth and Svend Erik for securing my affairs in trust for my daughters and providing them a nurturing environment when I must be allowed to focus on the security of my wife and boys. All of my girls are safe with them and that provides Birgitte and myself great relief and ability to concentrate on that which matters most.

Joshua and his 'tribe' for bravely housing us fugitives and helping us find Nikoline in the river and helping us through the worst night of our lives.

Elizabeth, Steven, and Brenda, Abel and their families for their warm support and use of their vehicle while my family was in need. Elizabeth has offered ongoing assistance involving our horses and other matters. I wish to also make a special thank you to Steven for his fabulous work with our drama group. These presentations gave the children excellent public speaking skills and expressive abilities. One of my most valued memories of Nikoline is of the Scare Crow in their brilliant presentation , 'The Wizard of Oz." When I remember our Scarecrow, I will think of Steven.

My Mom and Dad (I know he is still with me,) for their unquestioning support , stable influence and as usual, financial assistance. They never questioned, they only gave, unconditionally. If I could only give back a fraction, but alas this is what Dad privately wished me to do. Never, ever cave in to bullies when so few could see them as clearly as I could. Giving in to lawless people for personal relief only makes life worse for the next generation.

Michael, Maiken, and Chris and Luisa for opening their doors to us and sheltering us in safety, privacy and security for the time needed to plan our next moves. They offered counsel, but mainly offered the chance for us to grieve our loss in privacy whilst renewing our ordnance in response to those who have so recklessly abandoned the Law.

Tulio and Amparo for their love and generosity over the years. They opened their house to us and to all our friends to meet and hold a funeral service for Nikoline. Nikoline was well honored and Tulio and Amparo's house was the perfect setting. They are the 'heart ' of Barbacoas.

Juan and Zeidy and Eliezer for their absolute support and help in dealing with authorities during the first few days after Nikoline's death. Eliezer spoke with people in Puriscal and their generosity was astounding. Juan and Zeidy were our first friends in Barbacoas and our children grew up together and we had many fiestas together. We will always have them with us.

To all of our friends and neighbors in Barbacoas and Puriscal. Our clients, taxis, pirates, street people and others who have given our life meaning and value for the past 11 years. Our children felt complete as part of the real people in society when we sold our cakes, cookies and bread, or simply riding through town in our micro family 'cavalgatta'. We will never forget you, the real people. The workers and producers, not those with letters of self importance after their names.

And I would like to extend a very special thank you. A level of appreciation rarely earned. I know that Alison will find it difficult to post this on her own blog, however she has always given me full final authority on the content and spirit of the messages. That being the case, I am exercising that privilege at this time, above her comfort. The reason is clear. For what I am about to say is true and factual just as everything else I have presented in this blog.

Let me tell you of two people who have earned the truest badges of my highest honor. Alison and Miguel's undying support has walked us through the thick and thin of our life here in CR. They serve as my closest counsel and most powerful aids d'camp. Alison's artistic genius blog puts thousands of my words into ironic clarity with her illustrations. Miguel's research , translations and ideas have proven effective ordnance in exposing that which the 'public servants' wish to remain unknown. Alison and Miguel are my right and left arms in the triumph of truth and justice. The courts may believe they have control through the repository of the collective's force. I submit that courage will outweigh the court's usurped power and with people like Alison and Miguel in our camp, we shall illustrate that the application of truth is superior and shall prevail over licentiousness, cowardice and naked force. Alison and Miguel shall always have a special seat in my inner chamber even when I am busy putting out other fires.

In closing, I wish to make an observation regarding the above mentioned people (which involves hundreds.) Not all, in fact few of these people share my geopolitical beliefs. That in itself is the great hope that keeps me believing that good wins over evil. These above mentioned people set their ideals aside to help a family in need. Thats means that they all recognize and are in favor of a great simple truth and most unalienable right. The right to one's own life. Everyone recognizes the simplicity of personal choice when those choices do not harm others. Everybody has the inalienable right to one's self and that which one creates. This action of creation includes that which we create with our own genes with our mutual partner to create another in our likeness (children.) I see in all of these people's unbiased generosity the simple recognition that we have the highest claim to that which we create, so long as our creation does not harm others or be involved in mischief. We do not force, or even suggest that others live as we do because that may nullify their choices. These above people recognize through the blur and haziness of what is construed as 'law,' the real truth and that gives me the most light to focus upon.

To those above mentioned people:

I remain in your service when and where any of you believe you are in need of my arcane and unusual work.

Humbly yours,

James

~~~~~~

A los lectores de este blog, quisiera en este momento ofrecer unas palabras de aprecio para nuestros amigos y personas que nos han soportado durante nuestras épocas más difíciles. Quisiéramos agradecer a las siguientes personas:

Connie y Dick por valerosamente atestiguar, proporcionar el refugio y entregar documentos en los tiempos que más lo necesitamos, así como tomar el gran cuidado para mantener las imágenes de Nikoline frescas en las mentes de todos.

Fred y Mary por ser testigos y por ocuparse de las confrontaciones con los funcionarios del gobierno y los del PANI, así como cuidar por nuestros gatos y perros y su alimentación y por mantener ojo en nuestra casa.

Sorayda, Luis Diego y su familia, Lise Schafer, Gloriela y Daniel por ocuparse de nuestros perros, gatos y casa en nuestra ausencia inesperada.

Gustavo Rojas por su nexo con las cortes.

Rick por sus conexiones de información y por el enlace en cuestiones financieras.

Testigos y partidarios; Tu Anh, Athena y Eduardo por hacer entrega de documentos y por ser testigos.

Lise y Asger por su oferta continua de ofrecer la vivienda segura y por el viaje especial de Lise al Costa Rica para ayudar en cuanto ella pudo.

Don Carlos por su disciplina y cuidado en las clases de música y el coro. Nuestra familia amó las presentaciones y las prácticas. Siempre consideramos estas clases de música y los ideales de Don Carlos como una parte integral de la educación que dimos en nuestro hogar. Mis niñas adoraron a Don Carlos y él las animó a prepararse y a ser lo mejor que ellas pudieran.

Patricia y Roberto por abrir su casa a nosotros durante nuestros peores días después de la muerte de Nikoline, en donde la familia pudo juntarse y poder velar con seguridad y privacidad. Deseo extender aun mas las gracias a Pat y Bob por establecer una casa segura para hacer nuestros planes, preparaciones y por no preocuparse por materias sin importancia ya que proporcionaron comida, refugio, transporte y ayuda ilimitada.

Al tío John por vigilar los niños y por su ayuda financiera. La próxima vez que permanezcamos despiertos hasta las 5:00 de la mañana John, espero que sea bajo una mejor ocasión. Tu siempre serás un héroe para mí y para mi familia.

A la tía Laurie, por su no absurdo empeño a hacer las cosas a cualquier costo. Laurie es una de las pocas personas que conozco que en su vida con sus experiencias, lo ha visto todo y que ha sido lo menos posible crítica y la más pragmática de mi campamento. Su claridad y naturaleza imparcial fue refrescante y productiva y nos ayudo a continuar adelante.

Lisbeth y Svend Erik por asegurar mis asuntos en confianza para mis hijas y proporcionarles un ambiente consolidado mientras me era permitido enfocarme en la seguridad de mi esposa y mis niños. Todas mis niñas están seguras con ellos y esto proporciona a Birgitte y a mi un gran alivio y la capacidad de concentrarme en lo que más importa.

Joshua y su “tribu” por valerosamente contenernos siendo fugitivos y por ayudarnos a encontrar a Nikoline en el río y por apoyarnos en la peor noche de nuestras vidas.

Elizabeth, Steven, Brenda y Abel y sus familias por su calurosa ayuda y por el uso de su vehículo mientras que mi familia estaba en necesidad. Elizabeth ha ofrecido su continua ayuda en cuanto a nuestros caballos y en otras materias. Deseo también hacerle un agradecimiento especial a Steven por su fabuloso trabajo con nuestro grupo de drama. Estas presentaciones dieron a todos los niños una excelente capacidad de hablar en público y de habilidades expresivas. Una de mis mas valoradas memorias de Nikoline fue la interpretación del "espanta pájaros" en la brillante presentación, "El mago de Oz.” Cuando recuerdo a nuestro espantapájaros, pensaré en Steven.

A mi mamá y papá (sé que él todavía está conmigo,) por su ayuda incondicional, su estable influencia y como de costumbre, su ayuda económica. Ellos nunca cuestionaron, ellas solo dieron incondicionalmente. Si tan solo yo pudiera devolverles una fracción. Pero lo que mi padre en privacidad deseaba que yo hiciera fue de que nunca, nunca diera a ceder a los que te quieren empujar ya que muy pocos pueden ver a estos tan claramente como yo lo puedo. El dar a ceder a personas que actúan sin ley por solo su alivio personal, solamente hacen la vida peor para las siguientes generaciones.

A Michael, Maiken, Chris y Luisa por abrir sus puertas a nosotros y abrigarnos seguros, en privacidad y seguridad por el tiempo necesario mientras planeamos nuestros próximos pasos. Ellos nos ofrecieron consejo, pero principalmente nos ofrecieron la ocasión de poder velar nuestra pérdida en privacidad mientras que renovábamos nuestra lucha en respuesta a aquellos que han abandonado la ley tan irresponsablemente.

A Tulio y Amparo por su amor y generosidad a lo largo de los años. Abrieron su casa a nosotros y a todos nuestros amigos para hacer frente y para llevar a cabo el funeral de Nikoline. Nikoline fue bien honrada en el hogar de Tulio y de Amparo, su casa fue el lugar perfecto. Tulio y Amparo son el “corazón” de Barbacoas.

A Juan y Zeidy y Eliezer por su absoluta ayuda y soporte haciendo frente a las autoridades durante los primeros días después de la muerte de Nikoline. Eliezer habló con la gente en Puriscal cuya generosidad fue asombrosa. Juan y Zeidy fueron nuestros primeros amigos en Barbacoas y nuestros hijos crecieron juntos y tuvimos muchas fiestas juntos. Los tendremos para siempre con nosotros.

A todos nuestros amigos y vecinos en Barbacoas y Puriscal. Nuestros clientes, taxistas, piratas, gente de la calle y otros que nos dieron un significado y valor de la vida por los últimos 11 años. Nuestros hijos se sintieron completos al hacer parte de la gente real de esta sociedad cuando vendimos nuestras tortas, galletas y pan, o simplemente cuando montábamos a través de la ciudad en nuestra micro-familia “cabalgata”. Nunca les olvidaremos, la gente real. Los trabajadores y los productores, no a ésos con sus letras de presunción detras de sus nombres.

Y quisiera ampliar un agradecimiento muy especial. Un nivel de aprecio ganado raramente. Sé que Alison encontrará difícil fijar esto en su propio blog, pero no obstante ella siempre me ha dado la autoridad final y completa en el contenido y el espíritu de los mensajes. Al ser este el caso, estoy ejercitando tal privilegio en este momento, sobre su comodidad. La razón es clara. Lo que estoy a punto de decir es una verdad efectiva al igual como todo lo demás que he presentado en este blog.

Déjeme decirles de dos personas que han ganado las verdaderas insignias de mi más alto honor. La inmortal ayuda de Alison y de Miguel nos ha llevado por entre lo grueso y lo delgado de nuestras vidas aquí en Costa Rica. Ellos nos han servido como mi consejero más cercano y la ayuda mas potente del campamento. El blog artístico del genio de Alison pone millares de mis palabras en claridad irónica con sus ilustraciones. La investigación, las traducciones y las ideas de Miguel han probado ser eficaces en exponer lo que los “funcionarios” desearían que fuese desconocido. Alison y Miguel son mis brazos derechos e izquierdos en el triunfo de la verdad y de la justicia. Las cortes pueden creer que tienen control a través de su depósito de sus fuerzas colectivas. Someto que el valor sobrepasará el poder usurpado de la corte y que con personas como Alison y Miguel en nuestro campamento, podremos ilustrar que el uso y aplicacion de la verdad es superior y prevalecera sobre licencias, cobardía y la fuerza desnuda. Alison y Miguel tendrán siempre un asiento especial en mi cámara interna incluso cuando este ocupado apagando otros fuegos.

Como cierre, deseo hacer una observación con respecto a las personas mencionadas anteriormente (que implica centenares.) No todos, de hecho, muy pocas de estas personas comparten mis creencias geopolíticas. Esto en sí mismo es la gran esperanza que me guarda el creer de que lo bueno triunfara sobre mal. Estas personas mencionadas han dejado sus ideales a un lado para ayudar a una familia en necesidad. Esto significa que todos ellos reconocen y están a favor de una simple y gran verdad del derecho más inalienable. El derecha a su propia vida. Todo el mundo reconoce la simplicidad de opciones personales cuando esas opciones no hacen daño a otros. Todos tienen el derecho inalienable a su si mismo y al tal cuál el crea. Esta acción de la creación incluye la cual creamos con nuestros propios genes con nuestra pareja mutua para crear otro de nuestra semejanza (nuestros hijos.) Veo la generosidad imparcial de todas estas personas y el reconocimiento simple de que tenemos la demanda más alta a aquellos quienes creamos, siempre y cuando nuestra creación no sea daño para otros ni estén implicados en hacer maldad. Nosotros no forzamos, ni siquiera sugerimos que otros vivan como nosotros lo hacemos pues esto anularía sus opciones. Éstas personas mencionadas anteriormente a pesar de la borrosidad y nebulosidad qué se interpreta como “ley,” reconocen la verdad real, y esto me da la mayoría de la luz a la cual me puedo enfocar.

A las personas antedichas:

Permanezco a su servicio cuando y en donde alguno de ustedes crea estar necesitando de mi arcano e inusual trabajo.

Humildemente suyo,

James

In Loving Memory

This beautiful drawing was lovingly made by Nikoline, a pop up birthday card to my oldest.

Our friends in Costa Rica have suffered an unimaginable loss. On Thursday, September 29, one of their beautiful young daughters, Nikoline, died in a tragic accident.

Nikoline loved her family and the life they shared. She loved her horses and goats and each one of the jardinera hens and roosters and the countless chicks which were named upon hatching. Nikoline grew up pushing the family dog around in a doll stroller and cleverly figuring ways for him to haul sticks for the cook fire. She delighted in tea parties with her sisters and dressing her little brothers for after supper theatrical productions. She savored every moment she had with her grandparents learning new tricks in the kitchen, trying new artistic techniques, playing cards and taking long walks through the cloudy hills. Nikoline was just a girl, but even at her tender age, her being was defined, her path clear.

Nikoline was an artist. While she dabbled in dance and song, her gift was in the creation of beautiful images and stories. It is a loss shared by the whole world that she was not able to spend decades producing drawings and paintings, imagining clever narratives. Even at her tender age, Nikoline had a distinct artistic style. Her countless drawings and paintings told the story of her beautiful life. Vivid colors and confident lines captured horses and chickens and tree lined hillsides filled with flowers and songbirds. Nikoline loved life and she brought joy with her where ever she went.

All of her treasures have been packed in boxes. Little china tea sets and figurines, hair clips and necklaces, birthday cards and family photographs, school books and sheet music, fancy dresses and favorite jeans, everything packed and ready to join her family again, where ever that may be. Soon, sorrow will drain and the pure essence of joy that always radiated from Nikoline will fill the hollows of everyone who had the privilege of knowing her. That beauty will make us all stand taller and more courageous, never forgetting to live each day to the fullest and each action we make, with great care.

Ask Yourself

On September 6, 2011, one of our friends in Costa Rica punctually honored an order to appear in court. Our friend, however, was denied the hearing she was called to due to the fact that she appeared in the flesh without any sort of government issued number or identification. Since the very official who had brought the complaint against our friend was in the same room and could easily confirm her identity, it may only be concluded that the court was unable to proceed with the hearing because our friend lacked the contract which would enable the courts to speak to our friend at all.

On that day our friend was even denied the knowledge of what charges had been brought against her.

On that day, representatives of the government broke through the locked gate to our friends' property, invaded their home and confiscated their property.

According to the constitution of Costa Rica:

ARTICLE 25. The inhabitants of the Republic have the right of association for lawful purposes. No one may be compelled to form a part of any association whatsoever.

Not forming association with the Republic of Costa Rica is not a crime.

To this day, our friends have not committed a crime. No charges of any crime have been brought before our friends.

Our friends in Costa Rica have been forced to seek refuge to protect themselves and their children from the lawless actions of officials from the Ministry of Health in Puriscal and PANI. These officials have made it clear that they intend to take possession of our friends' minor children by force.

From afar, we have been able to confirm that the case number which was included in the order to appear in court is in fact a public record. There is a computerized system in Costa Rica where any individual may research any public record. Unfortunately, Puriscal lacks this sophisticated technology and so it is necessary for the public to retrieve public records in person. The charges should be made available to anyone, with association (government issued identification), no questions asked.

I challenge you to test this process.

The expediente, or case number, is 11-400185-197-FA.

Find out what the charges are specifically. Then ask yourself, how great is a country whose officials use coercion, intimidation and force against people who have not been presented with charges of any crime; whose officials deny those people due process; whose officials disregard the constitution they claim to be subservient to and whose officials inject terror into the same children they claim to be protecting?

Cautious but Free

On Tuesday, September 6, 2011 our friend in Costa Rica arrived early to a scheduled hearing at the Civil Court in Puriscal, Costa Rica. Unable to establish any charges against our friends prior to the scheduled hearing, our friend who was served, arrived at the Civil Court under the impression that the case involved the issue regarding the vaccination of our friends' minor children. Our friend brought with her two witnesses. Also in attendance was a legal representative for PANI, the agency for the protection of women and children, and Dr. Cerdas, director of the Ministry of Health in Puriscal, Costa Rica who arrived at least twenty minutes late.

Once all attending parties had finally arrived, our friend was asked by an assistant to the judge for her identification. Our friend answered that she was the individual to whom the order had been addressed and delivered. Our friend offered that her two witnesses could testify to the fact that our friend was the individual who the order had been issued to. Our friend also suggested that Dr. Cerdas, the individual who had accosted our friend at her home previously, could testify to her identity. The judge looked out from the court room on more than one occasion but did not address our friend. Finally, the judge's assistant delivered a message to our friend that without our friend providing identification deemed satisfactory, there would be no hearing. Our friend was, in the flesh, answering to an order presented to her. No charges were disclosed. There was no hearing. Our friend and the two witnesses with her left.

Later that day, an uncounted number of officials forced open the locked gate to our friends' private property, invaded and ransacked our friends' personal sanctuary and confiscated our friends' personal belongings including a computer. Dr.Cerdas was one of the officials present. It is critical to state the obvious fact that no crime has been committed by our friends. There is no harmed body. Our friends have not so much as acted in contempt of court. In contrast, our friends have made great effort to point out the constitutional laws which define the parameters of authority of the Ministries which have issued complaint against our friends. Our friends have very respectfully and patiently defined our friends' status and have expressed willingness to listen to the court objectively.

I would have expected more from a person who calls himself 'Doctor.' I have always looked upon doctors as servants of the health and well being of those around them. I imagined that people who call themselves doctors held a higher level of integrity and followed a certain sophisticated code of conduct. I never would have dreamed that someone who calls himself a doctor would so brazenly use intimidation and coercion to get his way. I would have thought that someone who calls himself doctor would have been eager to establish dialogue in order to communicate the benefits of his offer. I realize that language is often convoluted and that I have, perhaps, been mistaken to the purpose of the title of doctor in this case.

Included in the Dictionary.com definition of 'doctor,'

Doctor- (5) Machinery- any of various minor mechanical devices, especially one designed to remedy an undesirable characteristic of an automatic process.

I believe the above definition more accurately explains the role that Dr. Cerdas has played in this unraveling drama. Our friends clearly qualify as "an undesirable characteristic of an automatic process." As I have stated from the very beginning, this situation is not about vaccines; it is about law. This case is about perceived authority and enforced compliance.

The function of our friends' lives has been deconstructed. The community has been spared no threat of harm. Instead, the community has been robbed of some of its productive and contributing members. The community has been drained its resources for the sake of terrorizing educated, responsible individuals. Collectively, the community has financed the terrorization of innocent children. Our friends, with their children, have looked on their home, which once was their sanctuary, one last time and gathered what little they could and walked away, cautious but free.

Force and Intimidation

Dr. Bear made it clear to the Fox family's neighbor that he and his associates would forcibly take control of Mr. and Mrs. Fox's kits.

Puriscal, Costa Rica. On July 26, 2011 Dr. Cerdas and eleven other officials, some with handcuffs, arrived at the top of our friends' driveway in three vehicles. Our friends were away. Dr. Cerdas spoke with our friends' neighbor and said that our friends needed to call him, immediately. Dr. Cerdas told our friends' neighbor that the next time he and his associates visited, they would break our friends' gate down, take our friends' children, register our friends' children, vaccinate our friends' children and send our friends' children to school.

Our friends, especially their children, were terrorized by the news of this visit.

Terrorism-

1. The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

2. The state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.

3. A terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

Instead of engaging in a lawful dialogue, Dr. Cerdas and his associates have resorted to threats, intimidation, and coercion in order to induce fear and submission of our friends. This is a terroristic method of governing.


The following is the affidavit that our friends submitted in response to the visit they missed while they were away.

Delivered July 28, 2011 to the Ministry of Health and PANI and the prosecuter's office as directed by Dr. Doctor Cerdas to obtain the name of the judge and relevant information. When our friends approached the prosecuter's office, the representatives of the office of the prosecuting attourney refused our friends' testimony which indluded their request for infomation.

Translated to English.

Attention: Mr. Cerdas and the Ministry of Health , PANI, and other interested parties.

On July 11th, these ministries were presented with questions regarding their constitutional relationship in order that we assist them in creating an amiable solution. On July 15, when returning to the ministry of Health , they refused to answer the simple questions and did not request an extension.

On July 26, 2011, Mr. Cerdas along with approximately 11 other individuals bearing handcuffs, driving 3 vehicles answered to those questions by accosting my home when I was not present. My neighbor attests to talking with Mr. Cerdas, where he indicated that when they return they will break down the gate, remove the children, register the children, vaccinate the children and put the children in school.

Mr. Cerdas also insisted that I call him immediately and that it was very important that I call him as soon as possible.

We have not received ANY written answers to our questions and we have not received any intelligent approach to Law or respect of Law. Mr. Cerdas answered to our many inquiries with naked power, force, intimidation, and terrorism.

Why is it that Mr. Cerdas attests that we refused vaccination orders on the Orden Sanitario when indeed we never refused but conditionally accepted bearing that the facts on the order were incorrect?

If it was indeed an order under lawful dictate, why did Mr. Cerdas need me to agree to the order by signing?

Has Mr.Cerdas used an abuse of process by telling the court that we refused, when in fact we have not, so that he can begin the process of a malicious prosecution?

Did he indeed request that his associates (driver and policeman ) purge a document in order to allow a process to start which in fact has no basis in the claim that he makes?

Is it possible that indeed Mr Cerdas cannot answer the questions we asked , because if he addressed the questions , he would find that he and his associates lack the jurisdiction over the persona?

And is that the reason why they need information, cedulas, and other civil nexus, just as the prosecutor in 2002 needed the same in order to establish a persona and civil nexus or contract?

Why?

Is it possible that Mr. Cerdas is not operating within the constraint of the constitution of Costa Rica; Under article 11 , and 27?

How is that possible?

Later in the evening of July 26, 2011, I did respect Mr. Cerdas' wish and I called him as he requested.

I asked him the same series of questions submitted on July 11th of this year on and he answered affirmatively to the questions indicating that he is a 'public' servant under the restrictions of the constitution, that the vaccines were 'free' and that he supposed the government of Costa Rica was subservient to God of Israel.

Romans 13 and Acts 5:29 provide that the government has been authorized to create a judiciary capable of adjudicating criminal matters as well as matters of equity (civil matters involving contracts).

I then asked if he brought a court order to my home earlier in the day. Mr. Cerdas then indicated that he had brought a judge to the scene. I asked the name of that judge and Dr. Cerdas replied that he did not know. He responded that I would have to receive that information at the prosecutors offices. I further asked him how they could be granted a court order when I have never even been summonsed to court? The phone call was then promptly terminated and no further calls could go through.

Mr. Cerdas had asked me to call him, and I did for the purpose of establishing a lawful remedy. Mr. Cerdas clearly is not interested in establishing clarification of facts, but instead is focusing on an agenda that he has not divulged to me.

Being that we were never served with a subpoena , summons or citation to show up in court and give our testimony, and based upon Mr. Cerdas' lack of 'knowledge ' about the judge's name , I can assume that the ' judge' was a tribunal judge party to a private court which was to be held in my driveway.

For the record, Mr. Cerdas and his ilk have disregarded the nature of all lawful communication for the purpose of a lawfull remedy. Mr. Cerdas affirms that he is a public functionary in accordance with the constitutional laws of this country , yet he refuses to follow the constitutional laws (11, 27, 19, 25, 75 and others) by which we can establish a non threatening dialogue via written correspondence that would permit time to access counsel and intelligent responses that are not based upon intimidation and fear.

For the record, Sra. Duran of PANI, Sra Fernandez and Mr. Cerdas have not answered to our contructive notices in any detail, and instead of constructive dialogue, Mr. Cerdas, Sra. Fernandez and Sra. Duran of PANI resort not to law but to threats of coersion and terrorism.

The conversation with Mr. (Dr. Cerdas ) affirms that he is a public official acting in the public domain. As such, this testimony is the record of his public activities which will be made public for the purpose of transparency to those he claims to serve.