Ask Yourself

On September 6, 2011, one of our friends in Costa Rica punctually honored an order to appear in court. Our friend, however, was denied the hearing she was called to due to the fact that she appeared in the flesh without any sort of government issued number or identification. Since the very official who had brought the complaint against our friend was in the same room and could easily confirm her identity, it may only be concluded that the court was unable to proceed with the hearing because our friend lacked the contract which would enable the courts to speak to our friend at all.

On that day our friend was even denied the knowledge of what charges had been brought against her.

On that day, representatives of the government broke through the locked gate to our friends' property, invaded their home and confiscated their property.

According to the constitution of Costa Rica:

ARTICLE 25. The inhabitants of the Republic have the right of association for lawful purposes. No one may be compelled to form a part of any association whatsoever.

Not forming association with the Republic of Costa Rica is not a crime.

To this day, our friends have not committed a crime. No charges of any crime have been brought before our friends.

Our friends in Costa Rica have been forced to seek refuge to protect themselves and their children from the lawless actions of officials from the Ministry of Health in Puriscal and PANI. These officials have made it clear that they intend to take possession of our friends' minor children by force.

From afar, we have been able to confirm that the case number which was included in the order to appear in court is in fact a public record. There is a computerized system in Costa Rica where any individual may research any public record. Unfortunately, Puriscal lacks this sophisticated technology and so it is necessary for the public to retrieve public records in person. The charges should be made available to anyone, with association (government issued identification), no questions asked.

I challenge you to test this process.

The expediente, or case number, is 11-400185-197-FA.

Find out what the charges are specifically. Then ask yourself, how great is a country whose officials use coercion, intimidation and force against people who have not been presented with charges of any crime; whose officials deny those people due process; whose officials disregard the constitution they claim to be subservient to and whose officials inject terror into the same children they claim to be protecting?

Cautious but Free

On Tuesday, September 6, 2011 our friend in Costa Rica arrived early to a scheduled hearing at the Civil Court in Puriscal, Costa Rica. Unable to establish any charges against our friends prior to the scheduled hearing, our friend who was served, arrived at the Civil Court under the impression that the case involved the issue regarding the vaccination of our friends' minor children. Our friend brought with her two witnesses. Also in attendance was a legal representative for PANI, the agency for the protection of women and children, and Dr. Cerdas, director of the Ministry of Health in Puriscal, Costa Rica who arrived at least twenty minutes late.

Once all attending parties had finally arrived, our friend was asked by an assistant to the judge for her identification. Our friend answered that she was the individual to whom the order had been addressed and delivered. Our friend offered that her two witnesses could testify to the fact that our friend was the individual who the order had been issued to. Our friend also suggested that Dr. Cerdas, the individual who had accosted our friend at her home previously, could testify to her identity. The judge looked out from the court room on more than one occasion but did not address our friend. Finally, the judge's assistant delivered a message to our friend that without our friend providing identification deemed satisfactory, there would be no hearing. Our friend was, in the flesh, answering to an order presented to her. No charges were disclosed. There was no hearing. Our friend and the two witnesses with her left.

Later that day, an uncounted number of officials forced open the locked gate to our friends' private property, invaded and ransacked our friends' personal sanctuary and confiscated our friends' personal belongings including a computer. Dr.Cerdas was one of the officials present. It is critical to state the obvious fact that no crime has been committed by our friends. There is no harmed body. Our friends have not so much as acted in contempt of court. In contrast, our friends have made great effort to point out the constitutional laws which define the parameters of authority of the Ministries which have issued complaint against our friends. Our friends have very respectfully and patiently defined our friends' status and have expressed willingness to listen to the court objectively.

I would have expected more from a person who calls himself 'Doctor.' I have always looked upon doctors as servants of the health and well being of those around them. I imagined that people who call themselves doctors held a higher level of integrity and followed a certain sophisticated code of conduct. I never would have dreamed that someone who calls himself a doctor would so brazenly use intimidation and coercion to get his way. I would have thought that someone who calls himself doctor would have been eager to establish dialogue in order to communicate the benefits of his offer. I realize that language is often convoluted and that I have, perhaps, been mistaken to the purpose of the title of doctor in this case.

Included in the Dictionary.com definition of 'doctor,'

Doctor- (5) Machinery- any of various minor mechanical devices, especially one designed to remedy an undesirable characteristic of an automatic process.

I believe the above definition more accurately explains the role that Dr. Cerdas has played in this unraveling drama. Our friends clearly qualify as "an undesirable characteristic of an automatic process." As I have stated from the very beginning, this situation is not about vaccines; it is about law. This case is about perceived authority and enforced compliance.

The function of our friends' lives has been deconstructed. The community has been spared no threat of harm. Instead, the community has been robbed of some of its productive and contributing members. The community has been drained its resources for the sake of terrorizing educated, responsible individuals. Collectively, the community has financed the terrorization of innocent children. Our friends, with their children, have looked on their home, which once was their sanctuary, one last time and gathered what little they could and walked away, cautious but free.

Answers by Phone

The phone call that our friends made to Dr. Cerdas, director of the Ministry of Health in Puriscal, Costa Rica, was a call made at Dr. Cerdas' request. This request was delivered to our friends' neighbor. To paraphrase, Dr. Cerdas told our friends' neighbor that it was urgent that our friends call Dr. Cerdas. Dr Cerdas also added that the next visit he made would be one in which he would take our friends' children by force and make decisions for our friends' children as if they were his property.

Dr. Cerdas has made it clear that he intends to make display of his authority and deny our friends due process. Neither Dr. Cerdas nor PANI has answered in writing to the four simple questions that our friends addressed to both the Ministry of Health and PANI. However, when our friends placed the call to Dr. Cerdas, at his urging, our friends were able to ask him those same questions directly. Our friends made a record of this conversation and we have added a dramatization of it to our friends' You Tube video catalogue. Ironicly, as you will note, Dr. Cerdas has no urgent message to give to our friends after all.

Force and Intimidation

Dr. Bear made it clear to the Fox family's neighbor that he and his associates would forcibly take control of Mr. and Mrs. Fox's kits.

Puriscal, Costa Rica. On July 26, 2011 Dr. Cerdas and eleven other officials, some with handcuffs, arrived at the top of our friends' driveway in three vehicles. Our friends were away. Dr. Cerdas spoke with our friends' neighbor and said that our friends needed to call him, immediately. Dr. Cerdas told our friends' neighbor that the next time he and his associates visited, they would break our friends' gate down, take our friends' children, register our friends' children, vaccinate our friends' children and send our friends' children to school.

Our friends, especially their children, were terrorized by the news of this visit.

Terrorism-

1. The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

2. The state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.

3. A terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

Instead of engaging in a lawful dialogue, Dr. Cerdas and his associates have resorted to threats, intimidation, and coercion in order to induce fear and submission of our friends. This is a terroristic method of governing.


The following is the affidavit that our friends submitted in response to the visit they missed while they were away.

Delivered July 28, 2011 to the Ministry of Health and PANI and the prosecuter's office as directed by Dr. Doctor Cerdas to obtain the name of the judge and relevant information. When our friends approached the prosecuter's office, the representatives of the office of the prosecuting attourney refused our friends' testimony which indluded their request for infomation.

Translated to English.

Attention: Mr. Cerdas and the Ministry of Health , PANI, and other interested parties.

On July 11th, these ministries were presented with questions regarding their constitutional relationship in order that we assist them in creating an amiable solution. On July 15, when returning to the ministry of Health , they refused to answer the simple questions and did not request an extension.

On July 26, 2011, Mr. Cerdas along with approximately 11 other individuals bearing handcuffs, driving 3 vehicles answered to those questions by accosting my home when I was not present. My neighbor attests to talking with Mr. Cerdas, where he indicated that when they return they will break down the gate, remove the children, register the children, vaccinate the children and put the children in school.

Mr. Cerdas also insisted that I call him immediately and that it was very important that I call him as soon as possible.

We have not received ANY written answers to our questions and we have not received any intelligent approach to Law or respect of Law. Mr. Cerdas answered to our many inquiries with naked power, force, intimidation, and terrorism.

Why is it that Mr. Cerdas attests that we refused vaccination orders on the Orden Sanitario when indeed we never refused but conditionally accepted bearing that the facts on the order were incorrect?

If it was indeed an order under lawful dictate, why did Mr. Cerdas need me to agree to the order by signing?

Has Mr.Cerdas used an abuse of process by telling the court that we refused, when in fact we have not, so that he can begin the process of a malicious prosecution?

Did he indeed request that his associates (driver and policeman ) purge a document in order to allow a process to start which in fact has no basis in the claim that he makes?

Is it possible that indeed Mr Cerdas cannot answer the questions we asked , because if he addressed the questions , he would find that he and his associates lack the jurisdiction over the persona?

And is that the reason why they need information, cedulas, and other civil nexus, just as the prosecutor in 2002 needed the same in order to establish a persona and civil nexus or contract?

Why?

Is it possible that Mr. Cerdas is not operating within the constraint of the constitution of Costa Rica; Under article 11 , and 27?

How is that possible?

Later in the evening of July 26, 2011, I did respect Mr. Cerdas' wish and I called him as he requested.

I asked him the same series of questions submitted on July 11th of this year on and he answered affirmatively to the questions indicating that he is a 'public' servant under the restrictions of the constitution, that the vaccines were 'free' and that he supposed the government of Costa Rica was subservient to God of Israel.

Romans 13 and Acts 5:29 provide that the government has been authorized to create a judiciary capable of adjudicating criminal matters as well as matters of equity (civil matters involving contracts).

I then asked if he brought a court order to my home earlier in the day. Mr. Cerdas then indicated that he had brought a judge to the scene. I asked the name of that judge and Dr. Cerdas replied that he did not know. He responded that I would have to receive that information at the prosecutors offices. I further asked him how they could be granted a court order when I have never even been summonsed to court? The phone call was then promptly terminated and no further calls could go through.

Mr. Cerdas had asked me to call him, and I did for the purpose of establishing a lawful remedy. Mr. Cerdas clearly is not interested in establishing clarification of facts, but instead is focusing on an agenda that he has not divulged to me.

Being that we were never served with a subpoena , summons or citation to show up in court and give our testimony, and based upon Mr. Cerdas' lack of 'knowledge ' about the judge's name , I can assume that the ' judge' was a tribunal judge party to a private court which was to be held in my driveway.

For the record, Mr. Cerdas and his ilk have disregarded the nature of all lawful communication for the purpose of a lawfull remedy. Mr. Cerdas affirms that he is a public functionary in accordance with the constitutional laws of this country , yet he refuses to follow the constitutional laws (11, 27, 19, 25, 75 and others) by which we can establish a non threatening dialogue via written correspondence that would permit time to access counsel and intelligent responses that are not based upon intimidation and fear.

For the record, Sra. Duran of PANI, Sra Fernandez and Mr. Cerdas have not answered to our contructive notices in any detail, and instead of constructive dialogue, Mr. Cerdas, Sra. Fernandez and Sra. Duran of PANI resort not to law but to threats of coersion and terrorism.

The conversation with Mr. (Dr. Cerdas ) affirms that he is a public official acting in the public domain. As such, this testimony is the record of his public activities which will be made public for the purpose of transparency to those he claims to serve.

The Difference Between our Friends and Others Opposed to Vaccines

"The Other Approach"

In the last request our friends submitted to the organization for the protection of children, PANI, in Costa Rica, they site article #55 of the Constitution of Costa Rica. It reads, "Article 55.- The special protection of the mother and minors will be in charge of an autonomous institution called National Patronage of the Infancy, with the contribution of the other institutions of the State."

Autonomous -self-governing; independent; subject to its own laws only.
PANI is the autonomous institution in charge of the special protection of mother and minors.

PANI has the authority to take people's children away.
PANI has "the contribution of the other institutions of the state,"(ie:health nurses and cops) yet
PANI is not bound to the laws of the state.
This is alarming.
Our friends pointed out in their request which they submitted to PANI that, "PANI is a construct of men, including a board of directors and as such requires nexus through contracts of consent over those whom it governs."

Nexus- a means of connection; tie; link.

The following work is offered by one of our friends to explain this relationship more clearly.

When we contract with government entities for the purpose of recieving the bounty of government handouts such as free health care, free schools, employment insurance , pensions and a plethora of other wonderous free gifts, we enter an area of law called civil law. This is the law of societal contracts and statutes. This mysterious world is adjudicated in courts of equity and as such require that contracts are bonafide and have all the elements of proper contract. We are born with unalienable rights of common law, which has limitations to strict liability , meaning we must pay for our own health care, education and financial well being. These unalienable rights are not given by men , but given by the God of Israel and agreed to by republics that are chained by consitutional restraints in nations that purport to follow the basis of Mosaic Law.

The result is that governments , such as the Costa Rican government as well as the US government has been created by men desiring to rule, but restrained under prior laws for the purpose of well heeled government , and good order within the the context of those prior lawful principles.

As such when government officials seek to enlarge their powers beyond the simple purposes originally espoused, they may need to create special contracts with those that desire the benefits from such 'new deals'.

If the offers made by government officials involve insurance for health care, or 'free' education , or any such schemes to 'limit' liability, we must create an official act of re-lieging. IE we must divorce the king of the common law in order to accept an new king to rule over us because we cannot serve both.

However it has always been our choice and is the corner stone of freedom in any republic. People broadly understand this as freedom of religion. But it also includes the freedom NOT to re-liege or make a new king to rule over you. To engage in limited liability we must make a contract with those making the offer. Since this is an operation outside of the ordained priniciples of the purpose of the government we must prove that we are in agreement to leave our common law behind on the land and venture out to sea in the law of contracts. The contract we establish with government is typically encapsulated in a card called a cedula or SS number. This card and number establishes that a comprehensive insurance contract exists somewhere in the government archives and you agreed to it. As you are not forced into an association by Law, (such as article 25 of the Costa Rican constitution) it must be agreed to voluntarily. This is where the concept " by the consent of the governed" originates.

Our Box

So many of us like to imagine that we think outside of the box. We watch independent films, listen to NPR, recycle, eat free range and organic foods, buy the boots that will last ten seasons and tattoo our passions across our backsides (well, maybe yours, not mine!) But, while we are so busy in our bubbly independent brains outside of the box, we pay no attention at all to the fact that our beings are swaddled in a box that few of us can even define. Seriously.

The situation that our friends in Costa Rica are facing right now is all inside the box. The You Tube videos that they shot during the visit from the Ministry of Health are translated now into English. If you take the time to watch the four videos carefully, you may observe that the official is simply attempting to deliver an order to our friends and has asked them to sign as proof of receipt. However, if you watch more carefully, the official is actually requesting that our friends sign the actual order in addition to the document that would prove that our friends received it.

From all of the great films we've watched, each of us can likely recite our rights when placed under arrest. "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law..." Now, our friends were not being arrested, but the official came down their driveway just itching for signatures and information to use against them in a court of law. There was no other reason for this official to not leave the order with our friends. This official had two witnesses with him who could have testified that the document was delivered. How many of us independent thinkers would have stood our ground and not signed away our rights in our own driveways just to get our mitts on that document?

Our friends are truly wonderful people whose daily lives epitomize our independent fantasies. Their multilingual kids grow in a loving environment with chickens and goats and horses, music classes and visits with grandma. Now their rural farm bliss is being rototilled by bureaucracy. The peace of their harmonious lives has been jolted by the individuals who can't handle the idea that there are people out there who function without the box.

Someone mentioned that our friends actions are selfish. For those passing judgment on this family who abides by law more than any other people I know, imagine if some official demanded something of you which compromised your moral convictions. What if, to lift the burden on society, the elderly were subject to be euthanized? When we contract with governments, we commit ourselves to the scrutiny of individuals who dictate what is good or bad for society as a whole.

All of us independent, "outside of the box," thinkers will do well to pay attention to what is going on here. You never know when an agency may knock on your door with an offer you don't really want to take.

Last week, our friends submitted a short request with four pungent questions to the ministry of health as well as the organization for the protection of children (PANI). Representatives from the ministry of health have answered our friends with silence. Representatives from PANI, however, have requested that our friends provide them with their name, cedula number, birthday, nationality, income source, address and marital status. The representatives have stated that it is necessary to have this information before they can answer our friends. In response to the request for that information, our friends submitted the following document to PANI on July 18, 2011. Below is that document translated into English.

In answer to the request for information of Mrs Duran of PANI.

I excuse myself for the direct nature of the previous request delivered to PANI secretary by me, Monday, July 11th, 2011. I assumed that Mrs Fernandez, official of the department of health in Puriscal would have shared the information that she demanded that I produce inside a time limit of 48 hours, June 27th, 2011, when you, Mrs. Duran and other associates accompanied Mrs. Fernandez to my Home in Barbacoas.

The department of health answered this request of 4 questions with silence and with no comment. As such, I only can assume that Mrs. Fernandez has not shared with you, the information demanded for me to provide within 48 hours to meet with Mrs. Fernandez' panicked schedule.

I responded with great effort and cost to help Mrs. Fernandez in her lack of organization that put Mrs. Fernandez in such difficult limitations of time. The Ebais #4 had received our answer to their offer of services some 6 weeks prior. Nevertheless, Mrs. Fernandez waited till the last moment to permit us to explain in more detail.

Nevertheless, it seems that you, Mrs. Duran, lack details of my identity, although you had sufficient information to come to my home, to accost me, and to explain to me the power that you have with your business consortium, (PANI), to take physical control of my children. I find that very intriguing. As Mrs. Fernandez seemed to be the official in control of that visit, due to the fact that she has all my previous history involving these vaccination issues, I would have expected that Mrs Fernandez would have shared with you the information (priority and current) that would establish the necessary facts that you request.

If communications with Mrs. Fernandez have lapsed with you as with me, I humbly apologize if you do not remember me or the events of June, 27, 2011, and thus my request for the information requires a civil nexus.

Therefore I offer you, Mrs. Duran, the history and documentation received by Mrs. Fernandez, that obviously was not shared with you.

This documentation is the result of Mrs. Fernandez' demand for information within 48 hours. As well, the original statement offered to the Ebais #4 May 16th, 2011, in regard to the matter of vaccinations.

I trust that you, with counsel will take the time to consider your position in taking physical control of my children above and over my objection.

PANI, under article 55 of the Constitution of Costa Rica is described as a trust or legal business consortium that operates autonomously, signifying, that although it operates with the cooperation of the government of CR, PANI is an autonomous business consortium that operates outside of the control of the government of Costa Rica.

Article 55.- The special protection of the mother and minors will be in charge of an autonomous institution called National Patronage of the Infancy, with the contribution of the other institutions of the State.

PANI is a construct of men, including a board of directors and as such requires nexus through contracts of consent over those whom it governs. PANI requires representatives or physical humans to physically remove children. As such it is the individual man or the individual woman that is responsible if the action lacks habeas corpus, mens rea or a bona fide civil contract. The fact that you cannot answer to my simple request for information, delivered to you Monday, July, 11th, 2011, without a 'persona' involving numbers, implies that PANI operates under civil law and requires consent and contract in spite of its autonomous relation with the government of Costa Rica. PANI is not under the mandate of Costa Ricans or their electoral bodies. PANI is under dictate of the United Nations through a ratification in 1990. The United Nations is another man made legal artifice with which we do not we have a contractual nexus, neither do we authorize the UN to rule over us in the form of a deity. In essence, we do not practice re-legion and we do not place foreign gods over the God of Israel, as that is the practice of idolatry.

Thus I ask these questions;

Are you, Mrs. Duran, a public official?

Are you subservient to the constitution of Costa Rica, or an individual, employed by an autonomous entity (PANI), with sufficient information about me to accost me in my sanctuary implying threats to take my children (property) over and above my objection?

Are you subservient to the laws of the God of Israel?

Please leave me the answers for these questions in your office within 3 days.

Thanks.

Request Submitted to Health Department in Costa Rica

On June 30, 2011 our friends were visited by Dr. Cerdas of the health department in Puriscal, Costa Rica and two witnesses, including one police officer. Dr. Cerdas brought with him documents which he expected our friends to sign. One of the documents was an order that made reference to our friends position regarding the vaccination of their children. The body of this document contained some statements that were untrue. The second document was one that would act as proof of delivery and receipt.

Considerate of the time and attention put into these documents, our friends wanted to receive the documents so that they could review them, with counsel, and reply. However, Dr. Cerdas would not release the documents to our friends without their signature on both the order and the proof of delivery. Our friends clearly understood that signing both documents would affirm the statements in them and essentially strip our friends of their lawful position on the matter. Our friends attempted to compromise by signing the order document with a note on it of certain conditional acceptances. However, Dr. Cerdas would not permit this. Dr. Cerdas and his witnesses left with the documents neither signed nor delivered. Dr. Cerdas refused to leave a copy of the order for our friends to review.

Representatives from the department of health (Ministerio de Salud) and the agency for the protection of children (PANI) have each made clear that unnamed persons from these agencies have issues with our friends, yet have not exchanged in a lawful dialogue regarding the matter at hand. In response to this silence, our friends have presented another, more straight forward document to both the Ministerio de Salud and PANI in Puriscal, Costa Rica.

Delivered on July 11,2011- Translated to English

Attention Dr Cerdas, Sra Fernandez, Sra. Duran:
I understand that the constructive notice I entered , may have been lengthy and confusing. Therefore , I offer once again the opportunity to clarify the vaccination issue, so that I may offer you a remedy and cure of this grievance and that you may resume your normal operation. In order to offer that remedy and cure, I require certain facts to be known as a point of law.
I beg of you to answer the following basic questions that will go far in us reaching an accordance.
1) Are you public servants?
2) Are you subservient to the constitution of Costa Rica?
3) What is the cost of the vaccinations?
4) Is the government of Costa Rica subservient to the God of Israel?
The answers to these questions should be respectfully available to me at your office within a reasonable time of three working days, when I will have them picked up.
If Doctor Cerdas, Sra Fernandez, or Sra Duran require more time to answer, an extension may be granted upon your request.
In the spirit of truth and pura vida,

A Visit from Dr. Bear

Though Dr. Bear assured them there was, "no problem," the clever Fox family found Dr. Bear's associates to be intimidating and his urging to sign the document from the health department, suspicious.

Ministry of Health Visit

Our friends in Costa Rica are currently affirming their position of not being lawfully obligated to vaccinate their children. It is easy to focus on the controversy regarding vaccinations and site research and testimonials on both sides of the debate; however, this is not about the personal and social benefits of vaccinations. The point here is a process of Law. The following video was made by our friends in Costa Rica as a summary of their encounter with the ministry of health in Puriscal, Costa Rica on June 30 2011.



It is important to note that our friends are respectful and cooperative. Our friends have published the actual videos of the event on You Tube. These videos will be published on this blog once they are subtitled. For record, here is an English translation of the actual addendum that they tried to submit so that they could sign for the receipt of the document the official, Dr. Cerdas, presented to them.

I conditionally accept receiving this document, if I can first bring this to counsel, and respond within a reasonable time of three days. My signature affirms, that the director of the ministry of health has performed his duty and presented his offer. The director affirms, that his document has been received. However, the offer, and the subject matter of the offer, require clarification of facts and law. As such, my signature only affirms receipt but in no way do I affirm, agree with or contract to perform upon the wishes of the ministry which the director represents. My signature in no way contracts me to the ministry which the director represents.

The following is the English translation of the latest Affidavit submitted to the Health Department, Ministerio de Salud:

June 30 , Dr. Cerdas accosted me at my home, insisting that I sign a document that explains that Ebais #4 says that I refused vaccinations for my children.
For the record, Ebais #4 is a building and legal artifice. Only individual men and women could make such a claim. Thus, as encouraged previously , if any of these individuals have a claim or wish to make claims regarding my performance or lack of performance according to their belief schedules, please state their names so that we can offer an immediate offer of remedy to these individuals.
For the record, we do not refuse vaccines, we simply do not find mandatory vaccines part of Gods Law. In fact to the contrary , there is prohibition to such religious (ministerial) rituals and practice of idol worship.
For the record , Dr. Cerdas REFUSED to allow us to keep a copy of their offer to treat. Dr. Cerdas and his witnesses alleged that we "refused' to accept his offer. As such we were not able to bring the offer and subject matter of the offer to counsel for proper understanding before I agree to sign and accept the conditions and subject matter of the invitation.
For the record, I did not refuse to accept the copy of the offer for the purpose of reception of an offer to treat. I conditionally accepted the offer for the purpose of examination with counsel, however, Dr. Cerdas made the executive decision that we were not 'permitted' counsel for the purpose of agreeing to the subject matter of the contract.

As such, to remain in honor and assist dr. cerdas in the performance of his duty as a public servant, I conditionally accepted the offer by underwriting the contract with the following:

- Non assumpsit contract

- all rights reserved

- without prejudice,

followed with my signature.

Dr. Cerdas REFUSED to accept my signature with these conditional acceptances and refused to allow me a copy to have without signature for the purpose of proper assesment with counsel before signing.

Dr.cerdas also implied other threats of other state ministries in order to coerce me to sign , thus comply with the subject matter of the offer.

For the record, Dr. Cerdas' facts ( as we recall) in the document were incorrect.

Dr. Cerdas did mention that he saw the Constructive Notice presented to Sra. Fernandez at the ministry of health June 29, 2011, but again misinterpreted it to suit his and the ministry's agenda when he said that “ you did not want to vaccinate” . The constructive notice specifically explained a prohibition of such medical rituals, but that we did not refuse upon the condition that the ministry can offer proof that the God of Israel requires me to take part in these medical rituals.

Dr. Cerdas REFUSED to allow us to inspect his document with counsel nor allow us the basic courtesy of a copy for our records. Instead Doctor Cerdas simply had his witnesses (driver, Rodrigo Cerdas Fernandez and policeman,Carlos Aravia Marin) sign his document to attest that I had indeed refused his invitaiton to treat.

For the record , both driver and policeman's signatures do not reflect a fact of our refusal to conditionally accept Dr. Cerdas’ invitation to treat, but attest to Dr. Cerdas claim that we refused his invitation to treat.

Mandatory Vaccines In Costa Rica

There is no illustration today. Just black. This is how I feel. I am low. I feel dark, sunken, sad. Our friends are facing darkness and not being able to physically aid them in their time of need, as they did in ours, absolutely crushes me. The best I can do for them is to tell their story. Please read on, and on. This one is long and important.

In Costa Rica, we became very close with this extraordinary family. Our kids have grown up together, our families mutually intertwined. In our darkest hour, while living in Costa Rica, they gave us support and counsel. They are multi-lingual, eco-friendly, resourceful, capable people who cultivate the land, look after their animals, and live peaceably among their neighbors. Not only are they warm and genuine people who are greatly admired among the local community in Puriscal, Costa Rica, they are independent, innovative, productive members of that community who hold the highest respect and understanding of the law.

Like many other families in Costa Rica and around the world, they choose not to vaccinate their children. Recently, they have been approached by the health nurses regarding a law in Costa Rica stating that registered inhabitants under the age of 15 are obligated to receive certain required vaccines. In respect to the law, our friends have answered, formally, with a constructive notice stating that they share no contractual obligation to the man-made agencies that have approached them. In other words, our friends do not have government issued identification numbers, cedulas. Cedulas in Costa Rica are the equivalent of SS numbers in the United States or SIN numbers in Canada.

What ever your opinion may be regarding this situation, the important detail here is the fact that this family is undocumented. They are the only people I know in this position. As you can imagine, there are many inconveniences that result from their commitment to adhere to the biblical laws they are obligated to.

Now, step into your own convictions for a moment. I guess that there are a solid percentage of people who, for moral reasons, refuse to do business with national chain super stores. These are corporations, made by men and women. These entities cannot force you to do business with them. It is not mandatory that you accept their products and services. However, if you were to solicit, for example, a super saver card from the establishment, you would sign some sort of contract that would detail the terms and obligations associated with your acceptance of such a card. By holding this card, you could accept certain benefits and promotions that non card holders could not.

Governments are a form of corporations and when we register with them, or when our parents register our births and solicit numbers on our behalf, we become contractually obligated to the all of the agencies that have been created under that entity. Without registration or solicitation of numbers, however, these corporation-like entities cannot demand that we do business with them. Likewise, by not holding proof of registration or assigned numbers, we cannot seek to participate in public programs such as health care, schools, libraries, etc.. We would not have the right to ask the state of anything, at all.

Our friends, for moral reasons, are unable to contract with governments. Respectfully, they ask nothing from those same governments. They live very responsibly and independently. They are not outside of the law, mind you, only the contracts specific to the man made entities. The decision to live this way, without exception, is not an easy one to stand by. But they do, asking for nothing from the state and living with respect to the lives and property of those around them.

Our friends have been dealing with the Ministry of Health in Costa Rica since 2002. Recently, the pressure has escalated. The Ministry of Health from the local district in Costa Rica has visited their house, again, with another Ministry, PANI (this is the agency for the protection of children) They have implied that they have the power to take away our friends’ children if they do not comply. Our friends have repeatedly been pressured to sign documents and respond to demands without sufficient time to prepare their defense. They are savvy enough to understand that anything they sign will in some way create a quasi contractual obligation with the state. Our friends only wish a logical response to the variety of notices that they have made. All they expect is an acknowledgement that these public servants are under law and submissive to the constitution.

What is important to each of us, does not have anything to do with whether or not we agree with the moral convictions and subsequent decisions of our friends in Costa Rica. But it is critical to pay attention to situations such as theirs to see that the individuals who act as public servants are in fact following the law without prejudice. As one of these friends so perfectly pointed out to me today, it is not the law, be it biblical or constitutional, which defends us. It is us who must defend it. Ignorance is not bliss. It is only ignorance.

The following is an English translation of the affidavit delivered to EBAIS #4 in Puriscal as well as an English translation of the constructive notice that has been submitted by our friends to the Ministry of Health in Puriscal, Costa Rica:

Affidavit:

On May 13, 2011, public health nurse, Cristina Ruby , of Barbacoas Ebais #4 offered her services to my family. We were not able to receive her, as we were departing.

On May 16, 2011, I visited the Ebais #4 and was greeted by Ebais officials; Cristina Vargas Ruby, Rolando Aguilar Diaz and Sally Hidalgo Arias.

Rolando explained in great detail the various services offered by their Ebais office.

Rolando and Cristina expressed that their offer of services to every household was mandated by their supervisory body, the Ministry of Health.

Above officials briefed us that they were obliged to offer the services due to their relationship with the ministry of health, and were required to make a statement that certifies to the ministry that they made all attempts to provide us with their services, but that we demurred.

After a cordial dialogue with the three officials , I became similarly aware that as issues that involved nurse Mireya Madrigal Cordero in 2002, and Dr. Rodriguez in 2008 both representatives of Ebais #4, who approached me offering similar services, officials Rolando, Christina and Sally required absolution from their employer , the ministry of health.

Rolando expressed that they needed a written proof of offer that they had administrated to the best of their ability , their services for the purposes of limiting their liability with their employer the ministry of health.

Above stated officials affirmed the need for me to sign a statement relieving them of reprisals from the ministry of health for my non acceptance of their offer to perform their employed duties.

As a commoner under the Laws of the Bible, I have no capacity nor authority to protect the officials of Ebais#4 from their employer or any other collective entity.

Based upon the above fact , I cannot contract with intent or implication to absorb or accept any reprisals arising from Ebais #4 officials lack of capacity by Law to enforce their employed duties.

I do have the moral obligation to offer these above mentioned facts by affidavit in favor of Ebais #4 officials’ absolution from reprisals arising from their duties to the Ministry of Health regarding this matter.

My dialogue with Ebais#4 officials; Christina , Rolando and Sally proved that they were courteous and professional. Their concerns were presented in detail with genuine candor and respect.

In respect of the nature of this affidavit, this notice shall serve as prima facie evidence of a constructive notice stating that:

By law, if my actions or inactions have harmed, damaged or caused concern to any man in the flesh and blood, allow that man to make his claim and present me with such claim, that I offer the notary opportunity to remedy and cure the basis of that charge or complaint.

And, or, if my actions or inactions have offended any legal artifice or collective entity by way of civil breach, inadvertently, or by coercion, obfuscation, machination , or otherwise forced by waiving my God given Rights, that such entity bring forth the original intent of the contract, that such intent and contractual format and construction be weighed under Law so that we may have opportunity to offer reconciliation.


Constructive Notice:

Preamble:

I, the author of this document, in the flesh and blood, hereby make the following declaration of truth, facts, testimony, and understanding of circumstances for the purpose and intent of seeking a remedy and cure for any tort, complaint, allegation or breach of contract presented to me. Matthew 5:25; CR constitution article 30.

I am of sound mind and although I may seek counsel of my choice, I do not seek, require or demand a state licenced attorney, nor will I accept any appointment of representation nor waive any rights.

In no way should the intent of this notice be vitiated by way of lack of form, lack of state approved notary signature, lack of state approved stationery as I wish to recieve no state benefits nor create reciprocal obligations for recieving any benefits. As such, this notice will be made as any common man can state his truth. Just as any judicial writ does not fail through defect of form. The intent and facts herein this notice shall not be degraded by clerical error or use of form. 'Breve judicial non cadit defectu forme'.

Although I have made my best effort to offer clear translations; any mistranslation or nebulous term shall not be used to semantically alter the substance of my intentions. 'Mala grammatica non vitiat chartum'.

In this notice I make many references to Biblical Law as we have been made aware by public official that the Laws of Costa Rica respect the Law of God. Thus I recognise the Laws of God to be antecedent, thus supercede the laws of the state unless I expressly consent otherwise to re-liege. 'Nunquam res humanae propere succedunt ubi negliguntur divinae.' Acts 5:29; Constitution CR Article 75.

Although I do make many references to the Constitution of Costa Rica, these are observations and merely corelative or coincidental and for purpose of cognitive awareness only, as I make no constitutional applications or claims nor desire to use the constitution as protective mechanism as the constitution is not a covenant made by me but made by and for its authors. 'Leges suum ligent latorum.'

I make many references in Latin as this language is immutable and not subject to semantic manipulation, thus offers a clear undertanding and path of intent.

As a point of semantic awareness, Patronato Nacional de la Infancia (PANI) , is a man made legal artifice or trust. As such any such legal artifice can only excercise legal action by virtue of lack of performance with contractees. The trust (Pani) is a man made creation which requires grantors / settlors in order for the trustees (PANI officials) to have authority over the beneficiary.

Record of Events:

On June 27th, 2011, a director from the ministry of health, Norma Fernandez, and two officials from Pani, Annia Lorena Duran, Isabel Cristina Videl, accosted me in my home.

As a matter of good record and as a part of insuring correct facts, I videotaped the encounter.

Official Sra. Fernandez explained, as we have been told before on multiple occasions, the benefits of vaccines, and that the vaccines are a matter of public code.

Pani official Annia Lorena Duran further implied that she and other Pani officials would take control of the children above my consent and over my objections, if she and other officials decided to do so.

I asked if they had received the affidavit that had been provided to Ebais #4 in May of this year. Sra. Fernandez confirmed that they had indeed received this document, but either she did not understand it or she believed it did not furnish the ministry with sufficient information or remedy.

I asked the ministry official, Sra. Fernandez, what she failed to understand or what was deficient about my affidavit. Ministry official Fernandez explained that the ministry needed to gain more information so that they could initiate action.

From previous encounters with ministry of Health and Ebais officials, a position of confidentiality and respect of law has been maintained. As such, no dialogue with ministry of health doctors, nurses, or officials has been made public as a point as respectful confidentiality on my part.

However, on this day Pani official Annia Lorena Duran conveyed a deeply disturbing statement of potentially assuming physical control over my children.

As such, I have little choice but to make public all communications, dialogues , and encounters with the ministry as a point of having proper witnessing and transparency of all dealings with said ministries.

Caveat;

Consider your actions after you have been made publicly aware of the following;

I am not aware of any contract with, or legal conveyance of my children to any religious body, corporation or ministry. My children are not registered in any 'Cestui que' trust or ministry of any religious body. My children are not registered with any governmental body and I reserve the right not to be forced into a contractual relationship with any manmade legal artifice. Constitution articles 25, 75, 19, and 11

My children are not numbered nor have I sold them nor conferred them to any religious body whereby any ministry can assume any lawful power over them outside of the powers given to civil authorities in accordance with the authority of the God of Israel.

In effect, my children have been given to me and their lives have been entrusted to me by the God of Israel. I am charged with the responsibility of protecting those lives that they be as I train them in the ways of proper service. My children are not property of the state or any religious body or ministry, nor are they in a state trust or registry. C.R. Constitution article 45; article 21; UN article 17 (2) ; Psalm 127:3-5, Genesis 33:5, Isaiah 8:18, Proverbs 22:6.

I reserve the right of self regulation and responsibility and I do not practice idolatry, nor do place man made gods , idols, democracies, over the God of Israel to govern over me above the authority the God of Israel has bestowed upon them. I do not and cannot practice state religious rituals conducted by its various ministries such as pledges of allegiance and alchemy medical practices such as vaccines.

I do not purport to be a 'sovereign'. CR Article 3

I recognise the sovereignty of the state of CR as well as the sovereignty of the God of Israel. CR article 2.

I am attempting to conduct myself and arrange the conduct of my family in such a way as to follow the rules of both sovereigns for the purpose of being in accordance with rules of peaceful conduct and submission to well heeled government as well as faithful servants to the God of Israel. 'Qui jure suo utitur, nemini facit injuriam.' Acts 5:29.

We do not seek/demand the state to be responisble for our health care, education, pensions, insurances, security and other such social security insurances for these are matters of strict liability. As such the state shall make no assumption that they are to force us to limit that which God gave us as positive Law responsibilities. Therefore, we are strictly liable for these social imperatives under the Laws and guidance of the God of Israel and these responsibilities shall not be confiscated by the color of law. Galatians 6:5, Timothy 5:8.

I have no knowledge of any contracts or quasi contractual obligations that were not made out of duress, coersion, or uneven bargaining power which bind me lawfully. 'L'obligation sans cause, ou sur une fausse cause, ou sur cause illicite, ne peut avoir aucun effet'.

I have no intention to make covenants with, or become contractually obligated with the state's social programs which limit my liabilities and responsibilities by way of article 25 of the Consitution of CR. 1 John 5:21.

I am an Israelite practicing Israelite law as permitted by article 75 of the constitution of C.R.

I do recognise the requirement to submit to the government and Laws of CR when they are in accordance with God's Law for the purpose of peace and order. Romans 13; Acts 5-29.

I do recognise my obligation to follow God's law over man's law when government statutes are not in accordance with God's law. Acts 5:29, Daniel 6:13

To contract, or make covenant (pledge alliegance) with a foreign god for the intention of engaging in activities such as usury, is prohibited by the God of Israel and considered idolatry, thus waives His protection. However, I freely submit to authority on matters criminal and or civil/private contract law. 1st Corinthians 10:12-14, Romans 13:1, Proverbs 22:26, 1 Samuel:8.

We would be in violation of Gods idolatry laws (First commandment) if we were to pledge allegiance to a new liege (King or rule maker) or contract with a new sovereign which would in effect replace God's social covenants with new political social policies that burden other men by shifting my responsibilities to other men. Galatians 6:5, 1 Timothy 5:8, 1 Corinthians 3:8.

I refuse to covet other peoples property or wealth by demanding the state become responsible financially and redistribute my neighbors wealth for my benefit. Exodus 20:17

If any man or officer of the body politic is damaged by my application of Law, please allow that individual to make claim and that any writ of habeas corpus be satisfied, so that I make immediate offer to re-concile voluntarily, for I am unaware of any such complaints or charges from any individual man. If any corporate entity, juristic artifice, group, association , or body of men is claiming a breach of contract in equity, please allow that entity to bring forth the contract in question as subject matter jurisdiction, that it may be examined, and that I may offer voluntary opportunity to respond for the purpose of just reconciliation. If such claim is made, but not volunteered to me that I may understand, and observe the lawfullness of such claim, a subponena duces tecum, plea in abatement and general demand for a bill of particulars will be my only recourse. Article 48.

Be it known that we have acted in accordance with all laws and attended promptly to any charge, citation or summons presented to us. In any controversy, we present ourselves voluntarily and with out prejudice; that the matter may have a swift resolution. No undue force will be required in any dealing with us. Article 37.

I have no knowledge of damaging any entity, real or artificial.

I have no intent to damage any entity, real or artificial.

I object to any summary judgement that damages me and/or my family prior to my making first opportunity to excercise a reconciliation through due process, in the form of verified complaints, writ of habeas corpus, knowledge of jurisdictional venue (civil/criminal), and the just examination of any presummed contracts.

I understand the State of CR is a man made association empowered by the consent of the people of this nation to carry out the laws of the state and such an organization cannot have more power than that of its individual creators. 'Derivita potestas non potest esse major primativa'.

If no damages to a man in the flesh are presented, then I can assume only damages to an artificial entity are available to pursue and that such damages are civil damages and the result of broken covenants.

I understand that the government is charged with the responsibility of adjudicating both criminal and civil breaches.

I understand that damages to a man in the flesh or violations of God's Law are crimes 'mal en se' and no contracts may be involved. However crimes 'en prohibita' or crimes against stautes where no habeas corpus is evident, result in civil (private law) adjudication. If a breach of a public code is the case, then such application requires that contract is involved.

If the public code is in violation of Gods Laws, then the code must be consented to by way of covenant and agreement, allowing the creation of a superior covenant with a new sovereign understanding that the state codes may be in effect. Article 75, 19, Acts 5:29.

To freely reject association with any assembly does not suffer restriction as any forced association might imply coersion which the state regards as 'illegal'. Article 25, article 11.

I believe it to be a fact that the constitution of Costa Rica is not subject to random manipulation or exclusion by officials under article 121(7), when the issue does not involve "crimes in se", or breach of Biblical law, but conversely, the adherance to Biblical Law. Article 11.

I believe it to be a fact that the functionaries and officials are bound to obey the rules set forth in the constitution as a prior condition to any subsequent new agreements or contracts. CR articles 11;18.

Previously I made no waiver of judicial contract enforcement and , although the state would have to take notice of such waiver under articles 27; 11, no such demand to take notice or act accordingly was made by us for fear of creating a reciprocal obligation as the state (or officials) would have to expend energy and time on behalf of my notice. I have no expecation for the state or state officials or citizcens of this country to be burdened by my actions.

I rigidly adhere to non-political , non religious activities espoused in articles 28, 19, 75 and a notice of the aforementioned doctrine may have been construed as having an agenda or political influence on other people. As such, we made no prior notice to avoid demonstrable political /religious agendas.

At this time I wish the court to take notice that I waive all rights to use the court to secure contractual agreements in commercial or civil matters as this is the nature of God's will over me. However, as a point of transparency and decency , this notice will be issued to the court for the purpose of allowing the court first opportunity of heeling, educating and controlling public servants. Matthew 5:39

Sra. Fernandez affirmed that she had indeed reviewed the history of, and was cognitive of our previous encounters with the ministry of health.

After reviewing previous declarations and dialogues , ministry official Fernandez and Pani official Sra. Viquez expressed intent to expand their authority beyond constitutional limitations and under the color of law proceed to harass and coerce.

When public officials display such behavior of incorrigibility, commoners such as myself must view this with extreme caution and take steps to protect both the Law as well as the people in danger.

As such, any actions of state officials operating outside of constitutional or Scriptural limitations that potentially disrupt the lives of me or my family, either physically or psychologically, will be treated as a tort. CR Const. article 45, article 21.

In no way do I relinquish authority, nor custody of my children to the state and in no way is the state to assume my children as chattles for salvage or maritime prizes for the purpose of confiscation. Any such act will be viewed as an unlawfull taking. Article 45; Ephisians 6:1-4; Exodus 20:15, 21:16.

As all ministries are legal artifices and non self referencing entities, the ' ministries ' have no power to act in the physical world without representation and offices of human intervention. Thus, any 'official' acting outside of constitutional or Scriptural authority will be acting as a private individual making the personal decision to self appoint themselves above and beyond their position as 'public servant'.

As a point of further clarification, I wish to make the court and the ministries aware in plain language that they lack jursidiction in personam. My family and I have no personas , cedulas , nor contractual obligations with the state of Costa Rica.

For the record, I DO NOT REFUSE the vaccines, I am prohibited from the use of such, lest the ministry can offer written verification that the God of Israel mandates the use of these chemicals in lieu of His Law. (Arguementum ab possibili plurimum valet in lege. Impossibilium nulla obligatio est.)

This notice and a complete record of events from 2002 forward now sit in trust at various points in Costa Rica as well as world wide. It has been CC'd to the local civil court as well as various other interested parties in confidence.

If due process is not observed, this document as well as a complete compilation of history of event will be released to media outlets world wide as a point of public service and transparency.

I believe that due to the unusual circumstances involved, the officials in question lack mens rea, due to their dramatic ignorance of facts . Although the ignorance of Law is no excuse, the ignorance of facts is excusable. ( Ignorantia excusatur non juris sed facti.)

I offer first opportunity for the ministry officials in party to this notice to recant their positions , that we all live in peace and harmony under Law.